[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32

Subject: Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
From: aiiadict@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:46:26 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-info: e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.142.247.101; posting-account=5kmk9wkAAAB22-WWGK8UTn8vQ5c3EvdQ
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: <t9lmi3pkbd4acbs7ovnvv1gugupropfok5@4ax.com> <a25645eb-86b6-43d5-951b-9b9ef2c3592e@w34g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <dv6dnTCrwbSxvtDanZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@comcast.com>
User-agent: G2/1.0
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:30811

On Nov 28, 12:13 am, "Michael J. Mahon" <mjma...@aol.com> wrote:
> In exactly what way would a system running an as yet undefined
> 32-bit processor be an Apple II?  (Oh, yes--"compatibility mode".)

The same way z80, 6809, 65816, 68000 coprocessors are "Apple II" ?


Rich

Follow-Ups:
- Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

References:
- WDC's 32-bit W65T32
  - From: Mike Maginnis <maginnis@computist-project.net>
- Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
  - From: aiiadict@gmail.com
- Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
  - From: "Michael J. Mahon" <mjmahon@aol.com>

Prev by Date: PRODOS and cassettes
Next by Date: Re: PRODOS and cassettes
Previous by thread: Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
Next by thread: Re: WDC's 32-bit W65T32
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread