[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer

Subject: Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
From: "Dunny" <paul.dunn4@ntlworld.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:33:10 -0000
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.amstrad.8bit, comp.sys.apple2
References: <1107173315.002652.278190@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com> <ZGsLd.148$fA6.40@newsfe2-gui.ntli.net> <p14brb5h71m.fsf@panini.cling.gu.se>
Reply-to: "Dunny" <paul.dunn@gmail.com>
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.cbm:15209 comp.sys.atari.8bit:3403 comp.sys.sinclair:12330 comp.sys.amstrad.8bit:1735 comp.sys.apple2:7781

"MagerValp" <MagerValp@cling.gu.se> wrote in message 
p14brb5h71m.fsf@panini.cling.gu.se">news:p14brb5h71m.fsf@panini.cling.gu.se...

> K> or is the Z80 implemented in FPGA?
>
> Yes. It's actually a small RISC CPU that interprets Z80 and 6502
> opcodes.

What's the compatibility like for the z80 side of things? Meaning the 
undocumented opcodes and flag behaviour?

D.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
  - From: MagerValp <MagerValp@cling.gu.se>

References:
- A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
  - From: "Blake Patterson" <blakespot@gmail.com>
- Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
  - From: "Kryten" <kryten_droid_obfusticator@ntlworld.com>
- Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
  - From: MagerValp <MagerValp@cling.gu.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Cat and "Doctor" Turley...
Next by Date: Re: here we go again...
Previous by thread: Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
Next by thread: Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread