[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Alternate character set + Ext 80 col/AppleColor RGB card
- Subject: Re: Alternate character set + Ext 80 col/AppleColor RGB card
- From: "Ranando King" <rk@magictouchcorp.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:52:05 -0600
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Newsville.Com (http://www.newsville.com)
- References: <ogkCd.9$nZ.52@news.oracle.com>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:6707
Thank you for verifying what was only a vague memory for me... the 16 color
Text mode.
As for your question, the Mouse Text is an extra character set in the
character ROM on the motherboard, enabled by a softswitch.
$C00E to enable MouseText
$C00F to disable MouseText
I might have that backwards though.
Enjoy
R.
"Martin Doherty" <martin.doherty@undisclosed.com> wrote in message
news:ogkCd.9$nZ.52@news.oracle.com...
> Was just stuffing about last night with the alternate character set on
> my enhanced IIe: wrote a short BASIC program to switch character set and
> then poke ASCII values into screen memory, and was rewarded with my
> first look at MouseText characters (on my Apple M100 digital RGB monitor
> which is driven by the Ext 80 col/RGB card in the AUX slot).
>
> Then I was stuffing about with the Ext 80 col/RGB demo disk, one menu
> option displayed the primary and alternate character sets, and where the
> MouseText characters should be were inverse Uppercase. This is the
> result you'd expect on an unenhanced IIe.
>
> I'm not sure how to reconcile the two results. My current theory is
> that in the first case the motherboard was generating the characters
> (although the video signal comes out of the AUX card), but in the second
> the RGB card had taken over and was using its own character generator
> chip, which seems to be equivalent to the unenhanced IIe in its lack of
> MouseText.
>
> Pity, because I was thinking of trying out some things that would
> combine MouseText with the 16-color foreground/background text mode of
> the Ext 80 col/RGB card - but it looks like they are mutually exclusive.
> Anyone have any further thoughts? I suppose just replacing a chip on
> the AUX card would far too neat and easy to be an actual possibility?