[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RamFast SCSI question (comparison)
- Subject: Re: RamFast SCSI question (comparison)
- From: Jeff Blakeney <CUTjblakeney@sympatico.ca>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 20:36:02 -0400
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: Bell Sympatico
- References: <t%h3d.218268$Fg5.109163@attbi_s53> <mem3d.86895$XP3.70444@edtnps84>
- Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:4408
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:46:10 GMT, Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.dotnet>
wrote:
>The Rev D is a newer design and is suposed to be a lot less power
>hungry. It can also use a 1mb cache.
Does the rev C RamFAST have any cache at all? I thought it was more
like the Apple cards and didn't have any on board cache. The rev D
RamFAST came with either 256 KB or 1 MB of cache.
>I've never compared the two for speed so I can't comment on that.
If the rev C doesn't have any cache then the rev D will definitely be
faster. Especially under ProDOS 8.
--
Jeff Blakeney - Dean of the Apple II University in the
Apple II Community on Syndicomm.com
CUT the obvious from my address if you want to e-mail me