[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slowest IIgs RAM

Subject: Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
From: Ed Eastman <noone@nowhere.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:05:41 -0500
In-reply-to: <Z%DUc.25017$X12.1749@edtnps84>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: University of Nebraska-Lincoln
References: <411e5cab_5@corp.newsgroups.com> <cfrvog$7aj$1@unlnews.unl.edu> <qh4qn1a0om.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <4123008f$1_5@corp.newsgroups.com> <Z%DUc.25017$X12.1749@edtnps84>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:3279

Everything said about delays for propegation and etc are true. Howeveras a ballpark figure, I stand my by previous assertions regardingfrequency and speed. And most of my OLD IIgs chips are 150ns or faster,most of the NEWer ram chips are faster still. But not due to speedeffeciencies of the IIgs itself, but due to the what is available forthe best price in bulk.

I contend that iven if you used slower chips, many would perform fasterthan rated.


Thankx,
Ed

Wayne Stewart wrote:

The ROM 3s I have handy have 100ns RAM while the couple of ROM 1 I have handy have 150ns. All the IIgs memory card manufacturers seem to recomend either 150 or more often 120ns RAM

Wayne

References:
- Slowest IIgs RAM
  - From: exegete@nunya.biz
- Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
  - From: Ed Eastman <noone@nowhere.net>
- Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
  - From: Eric Smith <eric-no-spam-for-me@brouhaha.com>
- Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
  - From: exegete@nunya.biz
- Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
  - From: Wayne Stewart <waynes@telus.dotnet>

Prev by Date: Re: ROM 1 GS Battery
Next by Date: Re: *ANNC* a webring for the cpm operating system
Previous by thread: Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
Next by thread: Re: Slowest IIgs RAM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread