[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Archiving old magazines on website
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:08:00 -0000, "Tony A." wrote:
> "John Burns" <joobs@grizo.free-onlineNOJUNK.co.uk> wrote in message
> 956513434621452.NC-1.61.joobs@news.free-online.net">news:956513434621452.NC-1.61.joobs@news.free-online.net... [...]
> I didn't intend to detract from your argument there, quite agree.
No probs, I didn't think you were and I've been known to be a pedant on similar
hence no complaint from me. I just get rather peeved at those who try to spread
their non-knowledge as fact - there's enough mis-information on the net already.
And of course when this "fact" could land others in legal hot water it is even
worse.
> > discussion on
> > Shakespeare can it be so bad ;)
> I've always got time for the Bard ;-).
Yeah, but one of the problems with him is that so many of the words and phrases
have changed meaning over the years that for the uninitiated it is easy to
mistake the true meaning - especially when used or read out of context.