[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Apple II is crap

Subject: Re: The Apple II is crap
From: Linards Ticmanis <ticmanis@coli.uni-sb.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 01:24:35 +0200
In-reply-to: <ae64f04a.0308091203.5ecc0c@posting.google.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.cbm, comp.sys.sinclair, comp.sys.atari.8bit, comp.os.cpm
Organization: University of Saarland, Computing Center, Germany.
References: <46d567ad.0308081731.71bd8fd9@posting.google.com> <ae64f04a.0308091203.5ecc0c@posting.google.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.sys.apple2:33814 comp.sys.cbm:62983 comp.sys.sinclair:104902 comp.sys.atari.8bit:22707 comp.os.cpm:13991

Leon Howell wrote:

> For those of us who are sick of flamewars but interested in other
> computers, I was thinking of starting a thread comparing 8-bit multi
> user, multi tasking OSes, such as OS-9 Level 2, OS-A65, LUnix/LNG,
> etc.
> 
> Anyone interested?

What about MP/M? Or was that a "serial multiuser" system, only allowing
users to log in one after the other?

-- 

Linards Ticmanis

 The Master said, "The business of laying on the colors follows the
preparation of the plain ground."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Apple II is crap
  - From: "Jack Peacock" <peacock@simconv.com>

References:
- The Apple II is crap
  - From: llortagem@yahoo.ca (Adolf Hitler jr.)
- Re: The Apple II is crap
  - From: puritan_2076@yahoo.com (Leon Howell)

Prev by Date: Re: The Apple II is crap
Next by Date: Re: Revival
Previous by thread: Re: The Apple II is crap
Next by thread: Re: The Apple II is crap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread