[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- Subject: Re: Micro$loth Windoze 95 Badges - how they should be
- From: Bob Patin <bskate@nashville.net>
- Date: 1995/09/08
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc, comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc, aus.computers.ibm-pc, aus.computers.sun, aus.computers.os2, aus.computers.amiga, comp.sys.amiga.misc, comp.sys.apple2, comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc, comp.sys.intel, comp.sys.mac.programmer.misc, comp.sys.misc, comp.sys.newton.mi
- Organization: Summit Productions
- References: <welston-0409951915480001@blv-pm10-ip25.halcyon.com> <42ghu1$rra@newsbf02.news.aol.com> <G.Vaughn-0409952337390001@slip-31-7.ots.utexas.edu> <42o40a$9qt@news-2.csn.net>
>: The reason I, as a Mac user, dislikes Win95 (which I have used) is that
>: I'm tired of all the hype.
>
> Hype like Apple's "1984" commercial? Jesus-Friggin-Christ some
>people have short memories. Or perhaps you were still in diapers
>when that was aired.
It's amazing how you can call the 84 Mac rollout hype, when now MicroSloth is trying its best to
emulate the Mac as best it can (which will always be about 5 years behind). By the time MS
gets the bugs out of Windoze 95, System 8 will be out and screaming past MS once again. It's
just too bad that corporate America already has too much money invested in these PC
boat-anchors to make the logical switch to a better operating system.
So far as software availability, I'm not sure what comics you read, but Mac software is not at
all lacking. I can find and use software for anything I can dream up; that argument just doesn't
hold water. Not to mention that I can run Windows on my Mac (if for some reason I wanted to),
so I can run anything that runs on PCs, and at 486 speed (but why would I want to?)