[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relating to my recent discussions with Steve Wozniak.
- Subject: Re: Relating to my recent discussions with Steve Wozniak.
- From: Sheppy <the.sheppy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
- Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
- Injection-info: h4g2000pbe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.250.45.176; posting-account=t6FPhgkAAACeYIJxIcaPuSWfYcqgNkov
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
- Organization: http://groups.google.com
- References: <16915004.509.1335581798497.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynbh26> <1991520.958.1335657913625.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynee1> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204290218430.10944@ns383864.ovh.net> <jnicbk$sg6$1@dont-email.me>
- User-agent: G2/1.0
On Apr 28, 11:25 pm, brad <mrb...@ll.net> wrote:
> maybe i'm dumb but does this not fall under the "abandonware" or vintage
> computing part of the law that states you are trying to save/improve
> something for the future ie historical recreation etc
There's no such part of the law. "Abandonware" is not a real legal
concept. It's basically a way people make themselves feel better about
breaking the law in cases in which very few people are likely to
object.
Sheppy