Re: A solution?

[Charles Richmond <richmond@ev1.net>]

Curious Gene wrote:
> 
> Mike Pfaiffer allegedly said:
> > I.Dont wrote:
> 
> >> Instead of everyone either posting inappropriately, or not, as the case may
> >> be, why don't we create a group called
> >>
> >> comp.sys.apple.non-macintosh
> 
> >       Rather than call it a non-macintosh group, why not make it a catch-all
> > group by calling it comp.sys.apple.discontinued.
> 
> I was thinking comp.sys.apple.legacy or c.s.a.obsolete. But "obsolete"
> might be a bit too much of a catch-all. But I like the way "legacy"
> sounds. It sounds a bit more dignified than "discontinued".
> 
How about <comp.sys.apple.dreck>???  [ducks and runs away.....]

Actually, I *like* <comp.sys.apple2>...it puts top billing
right where it belongs.  (:-)) I really do *not* mind the
occasional off-topic question and answers. What bothers me
is the interminable bickering over copyrights and legal
issues. :-(

-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
|     Charles and Francis Richmond     <richmond@plano.net>   |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+