[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Apple //c+ questions....

Subject: Re: Apple //c+ questions....
From: dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson)
Date: 1999/03/11
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Organization: Empsoft
References: <19990309175644.25380.00000208@ng-fw1.aol.com> <19990309215113.07534.00000361@ng16.aol.com> <19990309220500.00363.00000382@ng-fv1.aol.com> <36E5EA0E.1591@ix.netcom.com>

Liam Busey <liam1@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Hmmm, in another message you stated that your IIc+ has a 6502A. IIRC, a
> 6502A is a vanilla 6502 rated at 2MHz. Shouldn't a IIc+ have a 65c02
> rated at 4 MHz?

It couldn't possibly be a 6502.  The IIc firmware has a lot of
65C02-specific code, and a 6502 would misbehave very quickly.

I don't have a firmware listing for the IIc+, but it almost certainly
has a similar level of 65C02-specific code.

-- 
David Empson
dempson@actrix.gen.nz
Snail mail: P.O. Box 27-103, Wellington, New Zealand

References:
- Re: Apple //c+ questions....
  - From: indizgize@aol.comXYZZY (InDizgize)
- Re: Apple //c+ questions....
  - From: supertimer@aol.com (Supertimer)
- Re: Apple //c+ questions....
  - From: indizgize@aol.comXYZZY (InDizgize)
- Re: Apple //c+ questions....
  - From: Liam Busey <liam1@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 65c802
Next by Date: Re: Apple ][ forever!
Previous by thread: Re: Apple //c+ questions....
Next by thread: Re: Apple //c+ questions....
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread