Re: It's MACOS dammit

[!smentzer@ecom.net (Steve Mentzer)]

>
>As to code developed by others, as I stated in the post, if the author
>gave permission or U/L it I had no problem with that, what my problem was
>that segments from the main operating code may have been there, wheither
>they have been modified or not; ie; logon,main,system.  Also even though
>they were developed by others, making them available as a general D/L
>would really not be a good idea, since there have always been a lot of
>pirate GBBS systems out there and Lance did not really do much of
>anything. I just was trying to make it clear, per my attorney what could
>happen. I have joined the Software Publisher Assoc, and will use them for
>any help that I may need. I have found a few systems that I could not ID
>and contected them, most had bought their systems from other SysOps and
>never bothered to transfer them, mainly because they did not know who to
>contect, in 2 cases they were pirate systems, one becasue he had gotten
>the program from the site and thought it was PD, the other guy just did
>not care, at least at the time, he send me a check for $25.00 and I sent
>him the latest BUG FREE segs, updated ACOS and the new 30K external
>editor; I think he got a good deal, don't you?
>


BTW - 

If you are still interested in deveoping a WinTel interpreter for ACOS, let me 
know. I think it would be pretty damn cool if we could allow existing segs to 
run under Win9x/NT. We could add a whole slew of functionality to boot!

smentzer@ecom.net