Re: A look at the C-One (Commodore One) reconfigurable computer

["AndyC" <andyc69@tiscal.co.uk>]

"Themistocles" <gryzor@spammm.gryzor.info> wrote in message 
369uimF4vjopiU1@individual.net">news:369uimF4vjopiU1@individual.net...
> Actually, Amstrad had perhaps the lowest return/repair rate on their CPC 
> machines... Really well built, from the early 464 to the last 6128+ (I 
> can't guarantee about the GX400; looks solid enough, but it's not very 
> much tested...).

The GX4000 is a pretty robust bit of kit. The sheer number of working ones 
for sale on ebay (given how few were ever sold) should be a testament to 
that.

Now if someone did a GX/CPC+ core, even I might get a C-1

AndyC