[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
Exegete wrote:
Ed Eastman wrote:
Although I have been avoiding this thread as it is innane, I must
admit I inadvertantly read this section and feel compelled to speak
about these two gentlemen.
Having dealt with both Roy and Bill publicly and privately, they are
both correct about each other to a point. Both are genuinly honest
and caring people and enjoy being right.
Roy is quick to point out a folley and is a bulldog debater, while
Bill frequently states opinions as absolulte facts using words like
never and always. See the diametric there?
If Roy were a bit less argumentative and Bill was a bit less absolute,
where would this discussion be?
:)
Me? Argumentative?? Nahhhh! ;-)
The thread is, of course, inane. Anyone who get so exercised over
someone stating their opinion deserves to get some of their hot air let
out.
Bill, as he has said, is touchy - too touchy, about MS and the PC. He's
even attacked me for DEFENDING the PC, because he's so touchy he read
into what I said things that I didn't say!
When someone tries to pass themselves off as "authorities" on a subject,
and don't have their facts straight,
OH, that grammar REALLY stinks!
Roy
then yes, I'll pop up and give a
correction. In my experience, such people usually go ballistic because
their self worth is on the line. Humble people, however, when in error,
will accept the correction, and go on.
When I'm wrong - and Ed, you know I have been, no, I won't like it, but
I'll accept the correction and go on. NOT because I'm humble (sometimes
I can be a really arrogant so and so) but because, as you stated above,
I like to be right, and if I'm wrong, I'll change, so I can be right! ;-)
If someone had done to me what I did to Bill, I'd adjust to the
corrected facts, and if I thought my opinion was still valid, I'd use
the corrected facts to still make my case, or just drop the subject and
move on (not that that happens all that often ;-)
As to my honesty - I've been thinking really hard, and trying to
remember, and I think, now, that you are right - that extra Transwarp is
yours. Do you want it back?
Roy
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
- References:
- Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Usenet1@gabrielmorales.net (Gabriel Morales)
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Mikael Ljungberg <mikael.ljungberg@telia.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Paul R. Santa-Maria" <paulrsm@buckeye-express.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: PCUser <netslacker@MSmustdie.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Ed Eastman <ed@apple2.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Prev by Date:
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- Next by Date:
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- Previous by thread:
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- Next by thread:
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- Index(es):