[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
"Paul R. Santa-Maria" <paulrsm@buckeye-express.com> wrote in
message 3FE27CD5.1FB66208@buckeye-express.com">news:3FE27CD5.1FB66208@buckeye-express.com...
: Bill Garber wrote:
: > "Exegete" <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com> wrote:
: > : 2. IBM did target the home market. Several times.
: > Again, those machines, short of the Jr, were ALL targetting
: > the business market. I should know. I freaking used them,
: > AT WORK.
:
: Sorry to disagree with you, Bill. The original IBM-PC had 64K
: and a cassette interface and was targeted at the Apple II in
the
: home market. Business users, seeing "IBM" on the case,
immediately
: purchased them and upgraded them to be usable in business.
I know Paul, but that Roy has rubbed me the
wrong way for some time now and I just went
crazy. I hate know-it-all types and he strikes
me as that type and I can't tolerate it.
- References:
- Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Usenet1@gabrielmorales.net (Gabriel Morales)
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Mikael Ljungberg <mikael.ljungberg@telia.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: Exegete <millers@noneofyourbusiness.com>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net>
- Re: Apple, IBM and PCs (Re: Apple, Jobs, and the irony of it)
- From: "Paul R. Santa-Maria" <paulrsm@buckeye-express.com>