[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: where to go for old mac questions (i know this is an apple group)



I kind of agree with what you day about group additions. If divided along microprocessor family the discussions might be more focused. Traditionally the // users have had no problem with /// users or those using // emulators. They all run 6502 code and access the hardware in a similar way.

The speed bump is when the issue of the Lisa and other very early Macs pop up. I own a plus, IIcx (needs a new power supply), IIsi, and a fried LC. I've asked questions from Mac people. The response was "Junk the old machine and buy a G3". I can relate to what Mac people are saying about finding better information here.

As we've all discussed before, I really think the 68k Mac folks need their own newsgroup. Not because we are exclusionary here, but because it would produce a more focused dialogue. In addition these people would develop their own FAQs (which I wouldn't mind reading). If a problem is common to both sets of machines (// and Mac) there is always the crossposting capabilities of the newsreaders. It would also let me ask my question about connecting my HP IIIp to my Macs and get an appropriate response. ;-)

It seems as though the question is the number of users who will use the group. Given the (mostly) less than useful responses to 68k Mac questions in the Mac groups, I'd say the numbers are pretty high. If we apply the same logic to /// users here, I'd guess we'd have between five and 10 /// users.

Back to the original question. Doesn't Google archive newsgroups back to the early '80s? Perhaps searching the archives might be useful.

				Later
				Mike



Byron Winmill wrote:
The idea of starting a legacy Macintosh newsgroup has certainly popped up
in the past.  Try searching for the subject "Proposed group addition" in
csa2 to get an overview of the issues, then you bump into the dynamics of
usenet (which few users, myself included, seem to understand).

But it all comes down to this: there is very little agreement as to where
the Apple ///, Lisa, 68k, and (increasingly) early PPC users belong.  Do
we belong in comp.sys.apple2 or comp.sys.mac?  In terms of architecture,
the latter makes sense.  In terms of culture, the former makes sense.
This really should be evident from how many of us integrate both the Apple
II and older Macintosh computers into our projects.

Byron.

On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, GGGNH wrote:

You could always start a comp.sys.mac.68k or comp.sys.mac.classic
newsgroup, if you feel there is a great need.





--
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|  Digital Civilization magazine: http://www.digitalcivilization.ca    |
|   http://members.shaw.ca/pfaiffer = Mike Pfaiffer (B.A., B.Sc.)      |
| See my web page before you think about spamming me. I charge cash.   |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
----- BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK -----
Version: 3.12
GCS/G/IT/PA/SS d s+:- a? C++ UL L++ W++ N++ o+ K- w(---) O+@ M++@ V PS+
PE !PGP t+ 5+ X R tv b+ DI+++ D++ G e++* h! r-- !y-- UF++
------ END GEEK CODE BLOCK ------